zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. RcouF1+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-17 23:42:38
> My preference would be ban handguns

We can’t even get assault rifles banned, good luck banning hand guns.

replies(1): >>jeffda+p2
2. jeffda+p2[view] [source] 2020-06-18 00:03:26
>>RcouF1+(OP)
All rifles combined -- including "assault rifles" -- are involved in fewer murders than knives. Also involved in fewer murders than hands/fists. This is true even in states where laws for obtaining them are very lax:

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-...

replies(1): >>Gibbon+18
◧◩
3. Gibbon+18[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 00:57:07
>>jeffda+p2
That's my point. For all the demonization of rifles and assault rifles, handguns are the bulk of the problem.
replies(1): >>RcouF1+vB
◧◩◪
4. RcouF1+vB[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 06:56:25
>>Gibbon+18
But I think handguns would be even harder politically to ban.
replies(1): >>Gibbon+nf2
◧◩◪◨
5. Gibbon+nf2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 19:30:03
>>RcouF1+vB
Big problem is the Supreme Court said states can't ban handguns. Which is sort of insane because they allow states to ban 'assault weapons' and sawed off shotguns.
[go to top]