zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. textge+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-17 15:03:51
And at last you've taken my advice

> Using a kafkatrap against an opponent you can't beat in debate when they have just pointed out the tactic is probably ill advised; perhaps try something else; Ad hominem or motte and bailey for example.

Allow my to quote from one your trusted sources: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/...

> Ad hominem: This is an attack on the character of a person rather than his or her opinions or arguments.

replies(1): >>DagAgr+j
2. DagAgr+j[view] [source] 2020-06-17 15:05:02
>>textge+(OP)
Feel free to provide me wrong by showing a non-libertarian source that takes this term seriously.
replies(1): >>textge+h3
◧◩
3. textge+h3[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-17 15:19:30
>>DagAgr+j
Appeal to authority (points for variety at least) is a logical fallacy that I literally pointed out earlier.
replies(1): >>DagAgr+8d
◧◩◪
4. DagAgr+8d[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-17 16:12:54
>>textge+h3
You really don't understand how logical fallacies work at all, do you.
replies(1): >>textge+zl
◧◩◪◨
5. textge+zl[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-17 16:51:37
>>DagAgr+8d
Well I must admit I haven't had as much practice at them as you have.
[go to top]