zlacker

> the message it would send to current and future customers

What exactly is that message? Maybe:

"If you make your money by separating families, putting kids in cages, and deporting asylum-seekers to places where they're in danger, then we don't want your money."

Do you see anything wrong with that message?

>>Christ+(OP)
The message I was implying was that github would no longer be seen as a viable option for government agencies.

>>newman+c4
Would that be such a problem? I use GitHub every day, but if they burn a bridge with the federal government it's no skin off my back.

>>moolco+gd
It wouldn't be a problem for me as an individual user either. Whether or not it's a problem for github's long term business model is another question.