zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. amcoas+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-15 17:18:30
So you don't agree with employees disagreeing with their company hosting code or developing tools for the Chinese government to run their concentration camps? Like the parent says, being non-political IS being political. You cannot separate it.

What is so bad about employees at a company having a say in what type of work the company does?

replies(2): >>akerro+C3 >>LunaSe+Nz2
2. akerro+C3[view] [source] 2020-06-15 17:31:10
>>amcoas+(OP)
>What is so bad about employees at a company having a say in what type of work the company does?

No, I don't think there is anything wrong with it, that's how we can change direction of the company and produce good. I think that's a very problematic path filled with mine-lands where employees decide how company makes money. GitHub can just outsource this project to Russia, Australia or India, still make money and deliver the project. Silencing voiced of those who speak, but still, being on a path of conflict of interests between board members and workers.

3. LunaSe+Nz2[view] [source] 2020-06-16 14:59:32
>>amcoas+(OP)
Would you be Ok with GitHub recruiting based on political opinion since there would for these to "match"?
[go to top]