zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. downer+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-12 19:09:22
It's somewhat telling that both the mayor and the police chief deny ordering the abandonment. Who the hell is running the city?
replies(1): >>loeg+jl
2. loeg+jl[view] [source] 2020-06-12 21:01:34
>>downer+(OP)
The open question is not about the city generally, but the police. "Who are the Seattle police accountable to?" And: good question. No one, apparently.
replies(1): >>downer+5Q
◧◩
3. downer+5Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-13 01:18:43
>>loeg+jl
The question of why the Seattle police abandoned a precinct isn't really a question of who the police are accountable to. Clearly someone who feels that the police are a malign force ordered them to leave. Who had the power and did it?

My guess is the mayor and/or the forces that pull her strings.

replies(1): >>loeg+FX
◧◩◪
4. loeg+FX[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-13 02:36:42
>>downer+5Q
> Clearly someone who feels that the police are a malign force ordered them to leave.

I don't think that's remotely clear. No one in SPD's chain of command feels that way and they definitely don't take orders from outsiders.

> My guess is the mayor and/or the forces that pull her strings.

Certainly Durkan doesn't feel that SPD are a "malign force" — she's a former prosecutor and has only been supportive of SPD. Including and especially during the last few weeks. She also doesn't have the authority to direct SPD, aside from appointing a police chief. So she has some sway over Chief Best, but she and Best are buddy-buddy. And Best has consistently claimed she (Best) did not order the withdrawal.

My best guess is it was a political / tactical retreat by a lower-level leader to end the violence and save face. That or union action by East Precinct officers — they just didn't want to be there anymore.

[go to top]