zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. libria+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-12 01:41:21
That comparison kinda worries me. Occupy had some hygiene issues and did not have a coronavirus to worry about.
replies(4): >>artemi+u4 >>vmcept+T5 >>rtkwe+f7 >>static+b91
2. artemi+u4[view] [source] 2020-06-12 02:33:50
>>libria+(OP)
The city has put in Port-a-potties and there are maps of nearby businesses friendly and with restrooms. Iirc, there is also some sort of plan for trash collection.

The coronavirus bit still isn’t good, but the city has learned for the hygiene bits.

replies(1): >>acidbu+Jb
3. vmcept+T5[view] [source] 2020-06-12 02:48:13
>>libria+(OP)
worries? its the most accurate obvious observation
4. rtkwe+f7[view] [source] 2020-06-12 03:02:12
>>libria+(OP)
It seems much less densely populated than the various Occupy camps ever were. Also their relationship to the cops seems 100x less adversarial given SPD has willingly abandoned the area.
replies(1): >>jatone+dA3
◧◩
5. acidbu+Jb[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-12 03:54:43
>>artemi+u4
I was just down there and saw a volunteer with a trash stick cleaning the streets. Seems like a good culture.
6. static+b91[view] [source] 2020-06-12 14:27:42
>>libria+(OP)
Occupy was in a pretty tiny little park, that was stuffed full of people. You could barely walk through it - you had to step over people sitting on the ground.

CHAZ is multiple city blocks. I doubt it's comparable in terms of hygiene.

◧◩
7. jatone+dA3[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-13 12:26:14
>>rtkwe+f7
the people involved in this have a very adversarial relationship with SPD, which is likely a big part of the reason SPD abandoned the area.

but the fundamental nature of these people are live and let live. So i'm not surprised at all that the area is doing fine and is perfectly safe.

[go to top]