zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. trfhuh+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-11 14:29:34
Without 2A, people like Breonna would have to rely on gentlemen like those that visited her apartment to defend themselves. For some reason I'm skeptical about this idea. Abolishing 2A would greatly increase safety for the rich, who will get to keep guns and armed guards regardless of any laws, and correspondingly reduce safety for the poor.
replies(1): >>acalla+W8d
2. acalla+W8d[view] [source] 2020-06-16 14:52:31
>>trfhuh+(OP)
This is madness, no other developed country do you need a gun to feel safe. Safety, or lack thereof, is a problem with policing. If more guns solved this problem, i think the USA would be the safest country in the world, but it's most clearly not. 2A is for 'well regulated militia', it was not written for just everyone to own assualt rifles.
[go to top]