zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. bagels+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-11 06:25:45
I actually don't believe it, but I have no evidence to support that belief. But it doesn't matter, because that actually makes it more reprehensible.
replies(1): >>kjafta+32
2. kjafta+32[view] [source] 2020-06-11 06:52:16
>>bagels+(OP)
They published a story about the publication of the article and the events leading up to it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/business/new-york-times-o...

The editor in question also resigned.

Not saying it justifies the original publication, but I appreciate the way it was handled.

replies(1): >>DagAgr+PK
◧◩
3. DagAgr+PK[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-11 13:32:33
>>kjafta+32
It was handled that way only after first handling it incredlby, horrendously badly. They were dragged kicking and screaming by their entire staff into handling it correctly only after a week of absolutely bungling it.
replies(1): >>jkestn+KR
◧◩◪
4. jkestn+KR[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-11 14:14:28
>>DagAgr+PK
I subscribe to the Times for that staff. I skip over the clickbait of the Stephenses and Brookses and read Blow and Bouie.
[go to top]