zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. lunixb+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-08 23:44:06
Conventional speech recognition will not have very good accuracy for this sort of task out of the box. You will basically need to do local (as in, based on map location) language modeling, and should probably do custom acoustic modeling as well (training a neural network on what radio speech sounds like).
replies(1): >>crazyg+T7
2. crazyg+T7[view] [source] 2020-06-09 01:02:56
>>lunixb+(OP)
Did you look at the transcripts? They do not have very good accuracy. A better solution probably should do those things; this one I'm assuming is not.
replies(1): >>lunixb+8a
◧◩
3. lunixb+8a[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-09 01:26:49
>>crazyg+T7
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."

Yes, I looked the website, and I also have my own website that does the same thing in a very similar manner. My comment was entirely in response to the suggestion Mac speech recognition be used for this. It should not be used for this. Based on previous experiments I have personally performed, it would be even worse than the website's accuracy. I then pointed out what a good solution might look like (and neither my website nor the linked website do the good solution yet)

replies(1): >>jcims+1g
◧◩◪
4. jcims+1g[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-09 02:29:58
>>lunixb+8a
Assuming you tried Amazon Transcribe? How did it fare?
[go to top]