zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. cddotd+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-08 22:56:59
I really like this idea - it also has the side effect of making all of these streams easily searchable later on.

That being said, transcription still isn't at the point where it can understand radio garble.

> because I'm going to take that group that someone over the Willing. Can you raise Lieutenant lady and having semi-open Buddhist month

> you know the carrot for you and Hudson no accident

Reminds me of the early days of Google Voice voicemail transcription.

replies(2): >>bberen+O >>wfbark+84
2. bberen+O[view] [source] 2020-06-08 23:05:12
>>cddotd+(OP)
Absolutely agree. I feel like the next step here would be to:

* Put the audio clip next to the transcribed text

* Flag transcribed text which fails some heuristics

* Allows users to suggest edits to the transcription

* Train the transcription models on contributed edits + police specific lingo

replies(1): >>gfosco+83
◧◩
3. gfosco+83[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-08 23:24:43
>>bberen+O
Cooperative community editing, genius-style, would be perfect. Big events would lead to incredibly accurate transcripts.
4. wfbark+84[view] [source] 2020-06-08 23:31:17
>>cddotd+(OP)
"strength tenets we do not have any to 9 available yeah five-year-old advisor. We have several dogs around miracles"
[go to top]