zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. thu211+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-06 10:48:43
OK. Where is the argument then? You've asserted, but not argued.

Today, Signal is claiming their encryption means the only data they have to give to government is date of install and last use. In the past they also claimed WhatsApp uses the same cryptography as them, at least for messages. These two claims cannot both be true. If there's some incredibly subtle detail that means deliberately exposing forwarding metadata in WhatsApp but not Signal they should really clarify that because it's not something I've ever seen a discussion of, and it doesn't follow from the cryptography they're using.

replies(1): >>CultOf+Xo3
2. CultOf+Xo3[view] [source] 2020-06-07 22:09:20
>>thu211+(OP)
They can both be true. Signal Protocol for message encryption is something different than Signal the official Signal Protocol client. ;) That’s where the difference lies and why the statement can be true: WhatsApp uses Signal Protocol for its encryption, but WhatsApp isn’t Signal.
[go to top]