zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. neilv+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-05 20:10:19
My layperson understanding is that there might be legal implications of the "without it being obvious" part. For example, I don't know whether that could be a problem in Massachusetts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#...

replies(2): >>driver+b >>werber+hy
◧
2. driver+b[view] [source] 2020-06-05 20:11:06
>>neilv+(OP)
That's for audio, not video. If you don't record the audio it wouldn't apply. If you do you shouldn't hide it to be safe.
◧
3. werber+hy[view] [source] 2020-06-06 00:13:44
>>neilv+(OP)
I do not live in a 2 party consent state. I’m in Detroit, and thankfully I’ve never seen anything bad. But I have had some awful encounters pre cell phone video
[go to top]