zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. kabach+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-05 08:34:21
Using phone number as ID has been proven idiotic since forever now. As much as I like Signal this is such a design flaw that it makes their software not only untrustable but often unusable too.

What's wrong with email logins?

replies(1): >>siberi+41
2. siberi+41[view] [source] 2020-06-05 08:47:51
>>kabach+(OP)
I'm no expert on the subject, but probably the use of phone numbers (and confirmation by SMS) is helpful to limit the number of bots.
replies(2): >>maxeri+4b >>noir_l+vc
◧◩
3. maxeri+4b[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-05 10:28:11
>>siberi+41
Phone numbers are used for contact discovery.

https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/

◧◩
4. noir_l+vc[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-05 10:42:24
>>siberi+41
Signal could still validate the phone number via SMS and immediately discard it afterwards.

Personally I liked the way ICQ did it back in the day, they used a uniq ID just for their service decoupling it from a phone number.

If Signal wanted to avoid long numbers, they could use a CorrectBatteryHorseStaple approach which is what Xbox does for their usernames if you don't pick one.

Easier to remember,

[go to top]