zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. anewdi+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-03 21:34:26
The CNN arrest was not violent, not were they held long. The reporter later said everyone was nice, and they had orders to arrest anyone in the path of the crowd who did not immediately disperse. If there is an example of the police acting badly, or treating press differently, this is not it.
replies(4): >>dharma+e1 >>thephy+f4 >>jbeam+T4 >>TallGu+Kl2
2. dharma+e1[view] [source] 2020-06-03 21:41:37
>>anewdi+(OP)
They were released quickly because the president of CNN was on the phone with the Governor of Minnesota within minutes.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/29/politics/tim-walz-minnesota-c...

3. thephy+f4[view] [source] 2020-06-03 21:57:13
>>anewdi+(OP)
Unfortunately, I don't think this comment should be voted down. I suspect it's exactly the orders police are given when the order to disperse a crowd/protest is given.
replies(1): >>colejo+fq
4. jbeam+T4[view] [source] 2020-06-03 22:01:04
>>anewdi+(OP)
An arrest doesn't need to be violent for it to be a bad act. At that point they were surrounded and would have had to push through the police to "disperse." They repeatedly asked police officers where they should go and were met with silence, so it's not clear where they were supposed to disperse to. They were arrested without the police saying a word as to why they were arresting them.

That screams of "I'm trying to figure out a way to arrest you, but I can't think of a reason. I'm going to do it anyway." Police should not be arresting journalists (or citizens!) for no reason. Being released quickly doesn't suddenly make the original act okay. It just makes it so it doesn't get worse.

◧◩
5. colejo+fq[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-04 00:07:33
>>thephy+f4
It’s downvoted because it’s arguing that because the arrest was short and not violent, it’s ok. That’s not how the law works; An unlawful arrest is an unlawful arrest.
replies(1): >>mehrda+Cq
◧◩◪
6. mehrda+Cq[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-04 00:10:01
>>colejo+fq
They were not saying "it's ok". Those words are getting put into their mouth by other people. They were saying it's not an example of "police violence", which was the allegation in the lawsuit.
7. TallGu+Kl2[view] [source] 2020-06-04 15:43:02
>>anewdi+(OP)
Well what were they arrested for, exactly? I mean even if charges weren't filed and even if there was only the thread of violence and not actual violence, police still must have cause to arrest you, and I haven't heard an explanation that isn't very well debunked by the live video. They even ask, and nobody answers them.
[go to top]