zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. virapt+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-02 20:45:59
It all started with the media, as in, police crime was documented. Now when police already uses questionable methods, cameras will point at them. Since they can't be identified in full gear, they can shoot at press without anyone stopping them, so I guess why not? They're already shooting at random people so there's a lot of aggression built up.
replies(2): >>dntbnm+Wo >>iso947+Lj1
2. dntbnm+Wo[view] [source] 2020-06-02 23:12:15
>>virapt+(OP)
The media didn't document the crime. It was ordinary people with smartphones.
replies(1): >>virapt+zp
◧◩
3. virapt+zp[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-02 23:16:49
>>dntbnm+Wo
Maybe I implied this too subtly: If you've got a phone camera pointed at police, there may be a legal definition difference, but effectively you're media or the content provider for them.
4. iso947+Lj1[view] [source] 2020-06-03 08:16:06
>>virapt+(OP)
Why don’t the police have visible numbers on their uniforms?
replies(1): >>lm2846+Io1
◧◩
5. lm2846+Io1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-03 09:11:05
>>iso947+Lj1
They do, but they put black tape on the numbers or conveniently have some piece of equipment in front of it. It's not like someone is going to punish them for doing that
[go to top]