zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. HarryH+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:10:58
I would like them to provide and require body cams for all officers

But we had police shooting at reporters on live TV already. It's not that documented misconduct didn't exist. What's missing is savage consequences for misconduct.

replies(2): >>chris_+3a >>mberni+gj
2. chris_+3a[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:52:24
>>HarryH+(OP)
Catching all this on camera seems to have spurred a movement, but most real change takes time to play out.

20 years ago most of this wouldn't have been caught on camera, so it seems like a net win.

3. mberni+gj[view] [source] 2020-06-02 19:33:10
>>HarryH+(OP)
I only take minor exception to them shooting at the press with pepper balls and things like that. Should it happen? Generally no, but you have look at it from the other side. These are large and violent riots and it’s very easy for people to pretend to be the press. It’s not practical to stop and validate press credentials under the circumstances. It sucks, but I don’t have a huge problem with it.

In terms of consequences that is why I believe there should be review at the state or federal level. The only way you can do that review at scale is with body cam footage. Most cases will be open and shut, but just the idea of being recorded AND being scrutinized by a higher authority would make a huge difference in behavior.

[go to top]