zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. zo1+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:30:18
We're not allowing governments to do the proper, necessary surveillance to control and prevent crimes in general, including ones at demonstrations/protests. Whenever these ideas start popping up, someone always finds some "privacy" concern that spoils a lot of tech-answers to crime and violence, including here on HN.

I find it very saddening as the victims of these crimes end up being victims that are ignored by "privacy" advocates and proponents, as if "privacy" is a bigger concern than violent crimes.

replies(2): >>ashton+0q >>pjc50+Oz
2. ashton+0q[view] [source] 2020-06-02 12:21:01
>>zo1+(OP)
The idea that we just need a bit more surveillance to ensure our safety is not a compelling one right now.
3. pjc50+Oz[view] [source] 2020-06-02 13:33:08
>>zo1+(OP)
The original violent crime - the murder of George Floyd - was filmed in public. That is the kind of violent crime that needs to be controlled to stop the cycle of riots.
[go to top]