None of these get more coverage than property violence. None of these got a response from political leadership.
It’s a bad look for the country that the only time our leadership is willing to punish law enforcement relatively mildly (currently the police officer in question is charged for only up to 35 years in prison with his accomplices merely losing their jobs, something statistically has been borne out that they get hired for more law enforcement work in neighboring districts) for killing someone in a terrible and slow manner is when disruption on property happens.
1. Should there be police at all?
2. If so, can an institution staffed by these particular people ever function correctly?
The more effectively the protesters self-police, the more powerful an argument they make that you could improve society by disbanding urban police departments and letting the protest organizers assume de facto responsibility for maintaining the social order.
Of course, the other end of the violence spectrum is an effective argument, as well.