zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. JMTQp8+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-02 01:27:26
With the recent protests it's been difficult to find local news coverage. But I found tweets, I found livestreams, but I couldn't find any reporters covering some of the most impactful demonstrations in my city in decades. In that moment, Twitter was critical.

There is a lot of bots and trash, but it has it moments where it is a wonderful tool. This is one of them.

Show me a believable bot that's going to fake a livestream of what's actually happening at the scene. There's far too much contextual information to fake it. I could identify the streets protestors walked down, the landmarks, the actions taken, the way the phone was temporarily thrown on the ground after a confrontation. Far too much nuance to fake all of that.

Faking a <500px low quality everything-is-burning but it's actually street lights picture isn't particularly groundbreaking when it comes to doctored images.

replies(1): >>aianus+Q
2. aianus+Q[view] [source] 2020-06-02 01:34:22
>>JMTQp8+(OP)
They don’t have to fake it, they can just film (or filter through) 500 scenes and only retweet the ones that fit their narrative while discarding the rest.
replies(1): >>batty_+L6
◧◩
3. batty_+L6[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-02 02:23:30
>>aianus+Q
I feel like the irony of your comment might be lost on you
[go to top]