zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. _bxg1+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-01 20:28:42
I'm fully okay with having officers flee the occupation if they've given themselves reasons to fear a legitimately ruinous suit.
replies(2): >>ambica+G3 >>downer+G6
2. ambica+G3[view] [source] 2020-06-01 20:47:38
>>_bxg1+(OP)
You realize that reason could totally be "He's a police officer in 90210 and rich people don't like being pulled over for speeding".
replies(1): >>_bxg1+f4
◧◩
3. _bxg1+f4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-01 20:50:42
>>ambica+G3
Pretty sure cases like that would get thrown out. And even if some didn't, I'll that tradeoff instead of the current status-quo.
4. downer+G6[view] [source] 2020-06-01 21:04:27
>>_bxg1+(OP)
The problem is that the legal system has a quite noticeable element of randomness to it. Despite what you may have read, justice is not always done. (source: have been on the receiving end of this)

As a practical matter, if there is possible liability, everyone will have to have liability insurance, just as in the medical professions, for example.

[go to top]