zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. snazz+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-01 20:14:07
How are they even allowed to say "any potential intoxicants" when they haven't tested for intoxicants? Did they do a test? That seems like a very powerful and prone-to-misuse political tool.
replies(1): >>bE9a3S+I6
2. bE9a3S+I6[view] [source] 2020-06-01 20:49:31
>>snazz+(OP)
You should watch the full length video of the fraud bust. It was very clear from the video that the police on the scene seemed to think he was under influence of drugs. They asked repeatedly what he "was on." They commented to bystanders, "this is why you don't do drugs, kids."

They tried to get him into police car for 10min and he resisted, and was saying that he couldn't breathe even prior to the knee+neck incident.

Combine this anecdotal information with a long rap sheet involving felony drug charges ( https://i.redd.it/2sc99kysho151.jpg ) and you have a pretty decent rough estimate that he was on drugs at the time. I'd also like to see official toxicology reports though.

replies(1): >>atomi+ac
◧◩
3. atomi+ac[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-01 21:19:06
>>bE9a3S+I6
I'm going out on a limb here but I'm thinking these protests aren't just about one guy.
[go to top]