zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. latchk+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-31 22:59:21
Ah yes, cops telling you that they didn't do it.

At first I said to myself "he didn't do it, he isn't a cop..." and then I started to think about the source of the information.

I'm not taking sides here. I don't know if he did it or not. I just like to question all sources at this point. Just because they say they didn't do it, doesn't mean they didn't do it.

replies(1): >>nullc+G
2. nullc+G[view] [source] 2020-05-31 23:03:29
>>latchk+(OP)
I'd totally buy you argument if there was evidence of it being a cop to begin with. But there isn't, as far as I'm able to determine.
replies(1): >>latchk+99
◧◩
3. latchk+99[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-01 00:10:29
>>nullc+G
I'm not arguing he was a cop or not.

I'm saying that cops telling you he didn't do it, seems like a questionable source to base your opinion on.

replies(1): >>nullc+3a
◧◩◪
4. nullc+3a[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-01 00:18:09
>>latchk+99
My opinion was based on the claim being apparently baseless. Someone saying "are you a cop?" to a masked person does not make them likely to be a cop-- in fact, it demonstrates that the cop-ness of this person wasn't readily apparent to the people who were actually there.

That they denied it is just additional (weak, sure) evidence.

[go to top]