> * this guy just wanted to do harm to the location for themselves > * somebody, acting alone or with others, is trying to either make the protests violent or make the protests look violent > * it's staged and the people staging the video are trying to make it look like there are agent provocateurs out there trying to either make the protests violent or make them look like they're violent.
This is not reasonable at all.
2/3 options assume that this is an agent provocateur, which, again, no evidence has been produced to support, which was the entire point in the first place.
Again, someone please produce evidence that this person was a cop or agent provocateur, or stop posting this rumor.
And, it has nothing to do with the number of the options, 1 2 or 3. It has to do with the percentages of probabilities of each option.
It could be there's a 90% chance of the first option and a 5% chance of the second and a 5% chance of the third.
What possible situation did I miss in the collection?
Is my list non-exhaustive?