zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. diffri+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 21:38:28
>Lots of people repeat catchy sayings without even knowing and endorsing who originally said them or even what those sayings originally meant.

This I disagree with, particularly since he doesn't have to consciously "know" or acknowledge anything explicitly for him not to understand the basic import of the statement.

I don't think anyone's saying he's capable of giving a brief one paragraph statement for an SAT question concerning Civil Rights activism in mid-20th century Florida, cause biases and prejudices don't need that much formal verification to commerce

replies(1): >>philwe+V5
2. philwe+V5[view] [source] 2020-05-29 22:19:47
>>diffri+(OP)
So by that logic, would you agree that anyone who cites “shouting fire in a crowded theater” in discussions about free speech is in favor of imprisoning pacifists for distributing pamphlets?
[go to top]