zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. riffic+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 20:36:01
There have been people making these arguments both for and against for a very long time. Even as an example, on this very site:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

I think you'll quickly lean in the opposing view after reviewing those viewpoints, because if Twitter was a utility it would have been declared one at some point in the previous 11 years.

replies(1): >>baq+1m
2. baq+1m[view] [source] 2020-05-29 22:56:59
>>riffic+(OP)
how long did it take to break up standard oil? ma bell?
replies(1): >>root_a+Mp
◧◩
3. root_a+Mp[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 23:26:01
>>baq+1m
What would it even mean to break up twitter? How would that work?
replies(1): >>baq+fb1
◧◩◪
4. baq+fb1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-30 09:21:05
>>root_a+Mp
i'm just pointing out 11 years is a very short time for regulators to do anything.
replies(1): >>root_a+TZ1
◧◩◪◨
5. root_a+TZ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-30 17:29:23
>>baq+fb1
My point is that websites are fundamentally different from resources you extract from the environment and the eagerness by some to treat them as such is specious.
[go to top]