zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. king_m+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:43:41
Would it be any different if it was a police helicopter manned with a guy with a video camera?
replies(2): >>colejo+I >>Thript+g2
2. colejo+I[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:46:49
>>king_m+(OP)
Yes, because a police helicopter is different for two reasons: (1) it’s not operated by CBP (who have no jurisdiction here), and (2) a police helicopter doesn’t have Hellfire missile bays.
replies(1): >>king_m+b1
◧◩
3. king_m+b1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 18:49:30
>>colejo+I
Putting aside the CBP issue (fair point, agreed, that's weird), it's not like police helicopters haven't been used for pretty bad things in the past - e.g. when Philadelphia firebombed it's citizens in the 80s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOVE

replies(1): >>morsch+av
4. Thript+g2[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:55:00
>>king_m+(OP)
Well, first I can almost guarantee that the surveillance tech being employed on a predator drone is substantially more advanced and wide ranging than a simple human operated video camera, but I also don't think it's a good idea to have guys with video cameras in helicopters recording protests either unless it's to film illegality. It has a chilling effect on the exercise of free speech. Peaceful protesters really shouldn't be getting surveiled / data gathered during protests shouldn't be getting mined, and unless authorities can guarantee that isn't happening then recording makes me uncomfortable.
◧◩◪
5. morsch+av[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 21:36:51
>>king_m+b1
Such a weird way of putting police reaper drones into context.
[go to top]