zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. chesch+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:26:24
Am I correct in assuming this is actively recording footage that will be processed later to identify the paths of criminals?

edit: Interesting, I left this post an hour ago and it was getting upvotes, now it's negative with no negative responses. I wish the down arrow only worked on posts you replied to first.

replies(3): >>coldpi+u1 >>dx87+W1 >>HarryH+76
2. coldpi+u1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:33:08
>>chesch+(OP)
"Criminals," yes. Likely some form of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARGUS-IS
3. dx87+W1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:35:07
>>chesch+(OP)
I wouldn't be suprised. After the riots in Baltimore, a lot of people ended up getting arrested because they thought they police didn't care since they didn't stop the looting, but they just combed through footage afterward and arrested people in the following months.
4. HarryH+76[view] [source] 2020-05-29 18:55:03
>>chesch+(OP)
You are correct, and you should be more worried about pervasive surveillance than about the government taking your guns.
replies(1): >>aksss+NU
◧◩
5. aksss+NU[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-30 00:17:46
>>HarryH+76
I'm not sure why the concern has to be mutually exclusive. The magic of "and" vs the tyranny of "or".
[go to top]