zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. phailh+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:54:18
Whatever tweet he retweeted, it's now unavailable. Looks like Twitter's moderation policies are working as expected.
replies(3): >>Improb+G >>dnissl+Y >>Y_Y+Z1
◧
2. Improb+G[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:56:53
>>phailh+(OP)
They protected their tweets.
◧
3. dnissl+Y[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:57:45
>>phailh+(OP)
She just made her tweets private is why that's happening
◧
4. Y_Y+Z1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 16:01:18
>>phailh+(OP)
"burn it down. fuck property. fuck cops."

That's what the tweet says, there are screenshots in the replies.

replies(1): >>Simula+Xh
◧◩
5. Simula+Xh[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 17:09:13
>>Y_Y+Z1
Let's compare that to "when the looting starts the shooting begins".

Which is an observation, and which is a directive? I think that is the key question that Twitter is dodging. They want to editorialize with their opinion as to which is which, but not for everyone.

replies(1): >>technt+5m
◧◩◪
6. technt+5m[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 17:27:45
>>Simula+Xh
Hacker News frequently threatens censorship, prevents users from responding for several hours, etc. Do you think they should have that right since it is their platform?
[go to top]