zlacker

Hiding the tweet instead of removing it seems like a good compromise to me, but I think this sets a pretty difficult precedent for Twitter. Once you start hiding tweets like this, you are implying that any high profile tweets you don't hide are not classified as glorifying violence. And every time you hide a tweet for glorifying violence, people who supported that tweet will show examples of other tweets which were not hidden to show that it should not have been hidden/removed. Seems like an impossible standard to uphold given the amount of people glorifying violence on their platform.

>>GhostV+(OP)
Only if they applied the rules equally to all politicians, and only if the process were transparent.

There's a lot of danger in allowing corporations to control the political conversation globally.

>>koheri+59
Too late for that. They have for many years. This is only the most visible form of control.

Corporations spend enormous amounts of money every year on exactly this. I believe lobbying politicians to take their side and the shaping of media coverage has had an even larger impact than hiding a tweet behind a click.