zlacker

To be clear, you are saying "don't try to prevent looting/arson because there is a tiny risk of collateral damage to peaceful civilians"

>>umvi+(OP)
Nope. I'm refuting your implication that the only people hurt or maimed by rubber bullets are the guilty:

>So... don't go looting? [...] You'll be perfectly fine as long as you don't reach for your molotov cocktail and baseball bat to go join in the "fun"

>>mthoms+f5
Why are there "peaceful protestors" in burning commercial zones, again? A smoldering Target seems like the wrong venue to protest at.

>>umvi+To
You know bullets can travel up to about two and half miles right? And that they can also ricochet?

This is not a video game we're talking about.

>>mthoms+Km1
Rubber bullets? Or real bullets?

>>umvi+To
> Why are there "peaceful protestors" in burning commercial zones, again?

There'd be little point in provocateurs burning commercial zones if there weren't peaceful protestors there.