zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. skoczn+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:14:09
How is looting stores and destroying public property a proper way to protest?
replies(2): >>krapp+C >>happyt+Y
2. krapp+C[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:16:51
>>skoczn+(OP)
Ever heard of the Boston Tea Party?
replies(1): >>SpicyL+F1
3. happyt+Y[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:18:17
>>skoczn+(OP)
The severity of the looting relates to how justified the use of violence against it is. It obviously does not relate to how justified the glorification of that violence is.
◧◩
4. SpicyL+F1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 13:22:43
>>krapp+C
The Boston Tea Party was a deliberate provocation. If the protesters here are trying to incite a violent revolution, I suppose that's their right in some sense, but all of us who don't want a revolution have a right to be put out by it.
replies(2): >>krapp+z7 >>jonhoh+u8
◧◩◪
5. krapp+z7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 13:59:19
>>SpicyL+F1
Sure, but in a country where the bar for legitimate protest is set by Constitutional law at "mass armed violence," everything else seems like fair game.
◧◩◪
6. jonhoh+u8[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 14:05:48
>>SpicyL+F1
Replying to krapp: violent armed protest protected by the constitution is explicitly targeted at the government in response to loss of freedom. That may be justification for attacking a police station, but not local businesses.
[go to top]