zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. mc32+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:03:01
That would make sense if every message were placed on hold before publishing while it got reviewed. But this is a real-time system. And even then, there are often multiple sides to events.
replies(2): >>wpietr+o >>illumi+C
2. wpietr+o[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:05:07
>>mc32+(OP)
Is it a hard problem? Sure. Can they get everything? No. But that doesn't mean that they can't quickly act to minimize the total impact. As with many things, 80% of the value can be gained with 20% of the work.
replies(1): >>SpicyL+W
3. illumi+C[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:05:42
>>mc32+(OP)
I'm not saying it's easy, but effort should be made as it is important. If you see the real-time voice recognition on the new Pixel phone, the technology for this type of action might not be that far away.
replies(1): >>mc32+71
◧◩
4. SpicyL+W[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 13:07:06
>>wpietr+o
The hard question is whether 80% of the value is available. If you restrict 80% of the worst offenders, but the selection of the 80% is biased in some obvious way, that may be worse than doing nothing at all.
replies(1): >>illumi+j3
◧◩
5. mc32+71[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 13:08:13
>>illumi+C
What’s sexy to me, to someone else is gratuitous sex objectification. Or vice versa.
◧◩◪
6. illumi+j3[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 13:18:57
>>SpicyL+W
Well, start should happen somewhere, no matter what those 80% consist of, then improve
[go to top]