zlacker

Should people be shot for looting?

Is looting a capital crime?

>>dannyw+(OP)
Wouldn't even matter if looting was a capital crime. We're talking summary execution without a trial. Judge dread territory here.

>>yibg+xV
The 2nd amendment was intended to keep people with a healthy fear of one another. The equation is clear - to take another's property means one must risk something even more valuable; one must risk their life. It's that inequality that preserves order and to try and rebalance the equation by cancelling out the ever-present constants and insist life is above both liberty and prosperity, then you are fundamentally altering the social construct in untenable ways.

>>blackf+q52
So then why don't we just have the police shoot on sight for any suspected crime? Police get called to store theft, just shoot the suspect. Police get called to vandalism, shoot first.

>>yibg+z92
The obvious reasons not to do that is because it is stupid, disproportionate punishment, prone to abuse and irreversible if there is a mistake.

>>roenxi+6u2
All that is a risk accepted by the perpetrator. The expectation of being safe from danger while committing a crime is absurd.