zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. dannyw+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-29 08:44:33
Twitter should have suspended the account of a repeated rule breaker a long time ago.

If I threatened to shoot the president, I would be in jail already, not to mention my twitter account would be suspended.

replies(3): >>areyou+Hz >>ikeyan+7I >>AgentM+z42
2. areyou+Hz[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:51:04
>>dannyw+(OP)
https://twitter.com/search?q=%22shoot%20trump%22&src=typed_q...

https://twitter.com/swoIIens/status/1266247882652278785 https://twitter.com/uwork4me247/status/1265065191311638529 https://twitter.com/SweeetTeeeaaa/status/1263924178048241665 https://youtu.be/E4i3bAtEuJE?t=184

replies(3): >>jerome+mM >>ceejay+v11 >>ViViDb+ak1
3. ikeyan+7I[view] [source] 2020-05-29 14:43:50
>>dannyw+(OP)
Twitter's stock price had far too much to gain to lose the traffic he brought. They are complicit in the current state of affairs.
◧◩
4. jerome+mM[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 15:02:58
>>areyou+Hz
This is a wrong way to prove your point because we don't know how many tweets and accounts were actually taking down for threatening violence.
◧◩
5. ceejay+v11[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 16:05:20
>>areyou+Hz
Hit the "report tweet" button, just like people have been doing to Trump's tweets.
◧◩
6. ViViDb+ak1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 17:26:12
>>areyou+Hz
The first direct link you posted is a RT if someone saying that their friend was arrested for exactly this. https://twitter.com/swoIIens/status/1266247882652278785

It sounds like you’re confirming OPs point, not refuting it.

7. AgentM+z42[view] [source] 2020-05-29 21:20:22
>>dannyw+(OP)
I don't disagree; I think my point is just another reason on top of that.
[go to top]