zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. 908B64+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-28 19:22:50
Several things don't add up here.

> Code being copied isn't an issue.

I looked at both repos and they share no code at all.

In his article, the author claims that " If I were the patenting type, this would be the thing you would patent. ps. I don't regret not patenting anything."

That's really not how patents work, and looking at the repo, a second year CS student could do the same really. I don't see anything that could remotely be patented. It reads where to find the installer from a config file and determine what to do based on an enum.

Throughout the article the author uses the term acqui-hire but it seems Microsoft was simply considering him for a PM position (and he failed the interview). There's nothing to acquire since there's no patent, no IP and no brand. Only a registered domain and what seems like an anemic userbase, if any.

Being featured in The Verge[0] and on HN's front page will probably bring a lot more eyeballs to the startups he's trying to promote. So congratulation for the free advertising!

[0] https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/28/21272964/microsoft-winget...

replies(1): >>fomine+Jp1
2. fomine+Jp1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 06:09:31
>>908B64+(OP)
It seems. It looks like very few HN posters compares actual source code or even open GitHub (C# / C++).
replies(1): >>908B64+kQ2
◧◩
3. 908B64+kQ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-29 16:42:57
>>fomine+Jp1
Not really a surprise. It's trendy to bash on certain companies, much less to fact check!
[go to top]