zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nojs+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-28 13:16:24
Wouldn’t that be GPL?
replies(2): >>Gordon+ae >>huhten+rf
2. Gordon+ae[view] [source] 2020-05-28 14:32:24
>>nojs+(OP)
No, that puts restrictions on everyone, which are so harsh many organisations (even startups) wouldn't touch GPL'd code with a bargepole.

I was thinking more along the ideas of adding restrictions only for corporations of a certain size, or perhaps only if they intend to use it in a certain way - kind of like the licenses that exclude large cloud operators like AWS from using your work without contributing back.

3. huhten+rf[view] [source] 2020-05-28 14:37:53
>>nojs+(OP)
No, of course not.

But the viral nature of GPL and the notion of "derived works" may be of some use here.

[go to top]