zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. bootlo+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-23 15:39:03
Now that I read what you quoted it does sound ambiguous. It doesn't explicitly say that the final interview is non-technical, but "skip technical screening" could be interpreted as implying that.
replies(1): >>asidia+J2
2. asidia+J2[view] [source] 2020-05-23 15:58:22
>>bootlo+(OP)
I guess they aren’t straight lying about how many interviews you’ll have, but to me riding that line of ambiguity with no course of action or any metric around what a technical screening actually is presented to the interviewee, it’s just as dishonest of an approach in my opinion.
[go to top]