zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. libso+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-23 15:30:42
Chill everyone. Ammon didn't mean to betray anyone's trust. He just executed public profiles feature very poorly and compared them to profiles on anonymous platforms which was naive. Before a lot of people see this and delete their profile if I were him I'd do this>

+Continue keeping it an opt-out feature. But give a long lead time. A month or two. Regular emails warning that profile will go public and a personalized screenshot of what exactly would be included. +If users want to approve the public profile, they will stop receiving these emails. They should also be able to choose who to show in their profiles. +If users forget to approve or deny, make an extremely minimalist profile public with only initials of the name listed.

replies(2): >>kerkes+s3 >>ashton+Ya
2. kerkes+s3[view] [source] 2020-05-23 15:52:31
>>libso+(OP)
> Ammon didn't mean to betray anyone's trust.

Sure, they sent out an innocuous-looking email that didn't actually describe the important details of what was happening, on a Friday, hid opting out in low contrast on a page where it would be unexpected to find it, and made deleting accounts so difficult that I would have never found it if someone hadn't posted it here, and it requires a government ID to do it.

But sure, all these dark patterns were unintentional--they didn't mean to.

3. ashton+Ya[view] [source] 2020-05-23 16:47:11
>>libso+(OP)
The patently bad faith arguments Ammon has been making here really undermines your point. No, whether or not I was looking for a job is not at all the same as a Stack Overflow profile, at all.
[go to top]