zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. judge2+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-23 05:41:50
> if I hadn't seen this post, I wouldn't have known about this

To be fair they sent an email to everyone who had signed up; I received the same email.

replies(3): >>gansty+d >>akisel+H >>broken+t6
2. gansty+d[view] [source] 2020-05-23 05:45:21
>>judge2+(OP)
My problem with this is the automatic opt in, using my profile and details for more than I intended for them to use it for (regardless of whether I technically signed something staying they _could_ do this, it is borderline unethical to use my information for this purpose), only having a week to "opt out", and not knowing what opt out even does. Sending an email to everyone doesn't cure any of these points.
replies(1): >>wolfga+y
◧◩
3. wolfga+y[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-23 05:49:51
>>gansty+d
Not to mention that the only reference to needing to opt-out is a veiled mention buried in the second paragraph. I skimmed the email briefly, said “oh that’s neat, what a great idea” and filed it under “things for the next job hunt” thinking I’d turn on my profile then.
replies(1): >>mhdhn+2g1
4. akisel+H[view] [source] 2020-05-23 05:50:47
>>judge2+(OP)
If we're going to be fair, we have to acknowledge the history of email over the last thirty years: spam, spam filters, and the "Mark as Spam" button.

Email is what I use to notify my customers of a 25% sale, not to tell them that I'm going to plaster their data all over the internet in violation of the spirit of the service I'm providing. I use regular mail for that.

replies(2): >>judge2+61 >>esoter+Jr2
◧◩
5. judge2+61[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-23 05:54:43
>>akisel+H
I'm very much only addressing the small string of text I quoted; I agree it should have been opt-in since many people don't check their email diligently.
6. broken+t6[view] [source] 2020-05-23 07:01:43
>>judge2+(OP)
who reads those emails?
replies(1): >>metaph+ri
◧◩
7. metaph+ri[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-23 09:12:03
>>broken+t6
Precisely why this dark pattern is so common.
◧◩◪
8. mhdhn+2g1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-23 18:17:14
>>wolfga+y
The link in the email did not work for me: it sent me to my profile, where I was presumably to be able to opt out of sharing my info publicly. But I could not see any way from there. Maybe I'm blind. As usual, googling worked better to find something on the site than using the site itself. Googled: triplebyte opt out -- that linked me to the right place. https://triplebyte.com/privacy-center
◧◩
9. esoter+Jr2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-24 06:40:39
>>akisel+H
I’m not sure using snail mail as the default venue for important information is really the smart play here. I check my mailbox a lot less often then I check my inbox and I don’t even open 99% of the mail I get since I assume it’s just junk. I’m a lot more likely to miss whatever you sent me if you had sent it by post than if you had just sent an email like a normal 21st century organization.
[go to top]