zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. mathew+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-14 12:50:55
> I ended up tokenizing Wikipedia for a blacklist and still missed a lot :(

That sounds like an impressive project in itself :)

replies(1): >>pbhjpb+Nc
◧
2. pbhjpb+Nc[view] [source] 2020-05-14 14:02:27
>>mathew+(OP)
Words not on Wikipedia, found on other sources, listed by frequency (perhaps with a date-weighting of the source document to reduce rating of older sources), would be an interesting way to find holes in Wikipedia's coverage.
replies(1): >>patric+4f
◧◩
3. patric+4f[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-14 14:13:27
>>pbhjpb+Nc
Someone should make a Wikipedia page of that list. Oh, wait.
replies(1): >>pbhjpb+9M4
◧◩◪
4. pbhjpb+9M4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-15 20:45:37
>>patric+4f
I like how you had information, made a sarcastic comment about it, but didn't share the actual information ... just in case your comment might prove helpful ...
replies(1): >>roryok+785
◧◩◪◨
5. roryok+785[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-05-15 23:05:09
>>pbhjpb+9M4
Are you saying the URL of that Wikipedia page is “actual information” that patrickthebold failed to share?

I think that page doesn’t exist. patrickthebold wasn’t sarcastically mocking people who were too lazy to look up that page. He was just making the point that as soon as a hypothetical list like that was uploaded to Wikipedia, it should be deleted, since those words would then be words found on Wikipedia.

[go to top]