zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. greens+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-05-13 19:57:23
Is that.. expected? A recursive definition?

  nepheaton

      the period preceding nepheaton
replies(1): >>cosbyn+49
2. cosbyn+49[view] [source] 2020-05-13 20:48:14
>>greens+(OP)
Haha, no but that's neat. The generation process is a sampling procedure so "anything goes" and it can stumble on unlikely samples from time to time. I should probably filter out recursive ones!
[go to top]