zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. greens+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2020-05-13 19:57:23
Is that.. expected? A recursive definition?
nepheaton the period preceding nepheaton
replies(1):
>>cosbyn+49
◧
2. cosbyn+49
[view]
[source]
2020-05-13 20:48:14
>>greens+(OP)
Haha, no but that's neat. The generation process is a sampling procedure so "anything goes" and it can stumble on unlikely samples from time to time. I should probably filter out recursive ones!
[go to top]