zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. satori+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-27 03:16:14
Well, OP did say "even if it's impossible to understand" so if it is in fact in any way misleading, then my lawyers assure me that I may claim the full privileges of a contextual get-out-of-jail-free card for linking to it, and am hereby fully absolved of any intellectual harm caused to any and all individuals who may have viewed it.
replies(1): >>mnchar+5Q
2. mnchar+5Q[view] [source] 2020-04-27 13:52:00
>>satori+(OP)
Ha. I've wondered if increasing embarrassment might reduce long-term stable misconceptions in education content. Like astronomy texts getting the color of the Sun wrong. Or wing lift discussed elsewhere. But making textbooks liable for intellectual harm... wow. What might the internet, media, politics, thought and conversation look like, if we were all liable for negligent intellectual harm?
[go to top]