zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. tprice+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-26 22:52:35
1. Carbon dating. Sure, I get that carbon decays over time and this changes the proportion of isotopes. But why does this give you any information? That carbon didn’t come into existence just to be in that bone, it was made in the sun billions of years before that, so why does the age of the carbon tell us anything about organic matter? The key fact, which I think is not emphasized enough, is that the ratio of isotopes in atmospheric carbon is kept at a constant equilibrium by cosmic rays. So you can use carbon dating to tell roughly when the carbon was pulled out of the atmosphere. Without this additional fact, the concept of carbon dating makes absolutely no sense.

2. The tides. The explanation I was given is roughly something like “the tides happen because the moon’s gravity pulls the water toward it, so you have high tide facing the moon. There’s also a high tide on the opposite side of the earth, for subtle reasons that are too complicated for you to understand right now and I don’t have time to get into that.”

The first problem with this explanation is this: gravitational acceleration affects everything equally right? So it’s not just pulling on the water, it’s also pulling on the earth. So why does the water pull away from the earth? Shouldn’t everything be accelerating at the same rate and staying in the same relative positions?

The second problem is that, when viewed correctly, the explanation for why there is a high tide on the opposite side of the earth as the moon is equally simple to why there is a high tide on the same side as the moon.

The resolution to both these problem is this: tides aren’t actually caused by the pull of the moon’s gravity per se, but are actually caused by the difference in the strength of the pull of the moon’s gravity between near and far sides of the earth, since the strength of the moon’s gravitational pull decreases with distance from the moon. The pull on the near water is stronger than the average pull on the earth, which again is stronger than the pull on the far water. So everything becomes stretched out along the earth-moon axis.

3. This one isn’t so much a problem with the explanation itself, more about how it’s framed. I remember hearing about why the sky is blue, and wondering, “ok, more blue light bounces off it than other colours. But isn’t that essentially the same reason why any other blue thing is blue? Why are we making such a big fuss about the sky in particular? ” A much superior motivating question is “why is the sky blue during midday, but red at sunrise / sunset”? I was relieved when I saw this XKCD that I’m not the only one who felt this way:

https://xkcd.com/1818/

replies(3): >>nabogh+L >>itcrow+R1 >>gus_ma+2y
2. nabogh+L[view] [source] 2020-04-26 22:57:39
>>tprice+(OP)
Carbon dating works because the level of carbon 14 in an organism is relatively constant while it is alive. This is because carbon 14 is created in the atmosphere not the sun. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating
3. itcrow+R1[view] [source] 2020-04-26 23:08:26
>>tprice+(OP)
Carbon dating can't say anything about dinosaurs (in the colloquial definition) because dinosaurs went extinct >>50k years ago and CD doesn't work after such long time spans.
replies(1): >>tprice+93
◧◩
4. tprice+93[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-26 23:20:47
>>itcrow+R1
Ok fair enough. I admit I regret this comment and think I posted it a bit hastily, I tried to delete it a few minutes ago but it appears to be too late now. I edited out the part about dinosaurs though.
5. gus_ma+2y[view] [source] 2020-04-27 05:29:38
>>tprice+(OP)
1) As other comment said, the C14 is produced in the atmosphere almost at a constant rate, and it decays at a constant rate. So as an approximation you can suppose that the concentration of the C14 in the air is constant. When the C14 is inside a dead body it is not longer replenished, so the concentration decrease slowly. [Note that the concentrations of C14 in the air actually changes. You can see in the Wikipedia article a table to fix the differences.]

For recent times, you can also compare the dates of the C14 with other methods like counting tree rings, or the date of a total eclipse and check the calibration.

2) You are almost right. The tides are not produced by the gravity of the Moon, but from the differences in the gravity of the Moon in the water that is nearby and the average of the Earth.

You forgot to include the centrifugal force [when you are in the non-inertial frame frame that rotates like the Earth-Moon system https://xkcd.com/123/ ]. The centrifugal force is bigger in the water that is in the more far from the Moon and again the difference creates the other tide.

3) The sky is blue because the single molecules in the air disperse the blue/violet color more than the other colors. There are many ways to produce colors. In this case the light is dispersed by the whole molecule.

A different method to produce blue is using a CD to produce a rainbow and the using a slit block the other colors. Some birds and butterflies use a somewhat similar method. [Not very similar but closer to the CD method than to the air method.]

The blue in the die for cloth uses another method. You make a long chain of conjugate chemical bounds C-C=C-C=C-C=C-C, and pick length and atoms so the electrons absorb the colors you don't like and transform the energy into heat.

I'm probably forgetting a few more method, there are many of them, so it's interesting to understand which of them make the sky blue.

*) These are good questions. My explanations are not 100% complete (and probably not 100% accurate) but I hope you can fix the holes.

[go to top]