zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. snowwr+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-22 04:21:12
I think he/she is being very patient with people who don't seem to have a good understanding of the law they're citing.
replies(1): >>lucb1e+mw1
2. lucb1e+mw1[view] [source] 2020-04-22 17:25:47
>>snowwr+(OP)
Really, you read that as being patient? To me it seems to be an obvious attempt to rub the person they're replying to entirely the wrong way while feigning ignorance.

I would flag it as attempting to trigger others if each reply did not also contain one or two constructive sentences.

> with people who don't seem to have a good understanding of the law

"People" had a fine understanding of applicable PII law, but the person clarified (in between a bunch of bullshit about how godforsaken sorry they are) that they were talking about some USA thing specifically and not the broader definition.

[go to top]