zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. underd+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-14 17:48:20
More likely, ammo in a potential legal battle between GitHub and the banned party.
replies(1): >>Cthulh+7d
2. Cthulh+7d[view] [source] 2020-04-14 18:46:51
>>underd+(OP)
So far it's been mostly small / independent developers or organizations that were banned, and Github has Microsoft behind it, a $125bn / year revenue company with a legal team 1,500 strong (https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2019/12/02/how-brad...). I don't think fear of litigation is the issue.
replies(1): >>koheri+fP
◧◩
3. koheri+fP[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-14 22:23:46
>>Cthulh+7d
The very first thing a corporate lawyer does is proactively prevent litigation through protective policies that specifically do NOT emphasize transparency.
[go to top]