zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. JMTQp8+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-14 16:29:48
Stuff like SAML is kind of the only leverage freemium SaaS has for rationalizing charging enterprise customers.
replies(1): >>atonse+x2
2. atonse+x2[view] [source] 2020-04-14 16:40:36
>>JMTQp8+(OP)
Not true. There are other things (like audit logs, invoice/PO payments, better support) that enterprises will still want.
replies(3): >>ryanis+I7 >>Corrad+9s1 >>JMTQp8+BC1
◧◩
3. ryanis+I7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-14 17:02:58
>>atonse+x2
Yeah but considering SAML is one of the primary asks of enterprise, it kind of makes it a big selling point.
replies(1): >>Spivak+6d1
◧◩◪
4. Spivak+6d1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-14 23:14:00
>>ryanis+I7
And people keep saying that it's a security feature but that's not why large orgs pay for it. It's a "I'll pay you to not have to manually manage account access to all these different services.
◧◩
5. Corrad+9s1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-15 01:32:49
>>atonse+x2
Yes, I'm pretty happy with the new pricing but my employer will probably have to go with the Enterprise plan to get access to the "Audit Log" and HIPAA compliance. :frown:
◧◩
6. JMTQp8+BC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-15 03:26:44
>>atonse+x2
If it's possible for GH to run a profitable business while offering SAML integration for free, I am 100% supportive of the suggestion. It's hard to say exactly how many enterprises pay specifically or exclusively for this reason, as opposed to other enterprise features, like audit trails.
[go to top]