zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Dubiou+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-02 23:46:35
So I watched the Cronkite stuff and it seems pretty similar to this.

https://youtu.be/VDv3_KfdBs4

So is your gripe generally applies to all contemporary journalism or specifically with CNN and Fox News? Isn't it just as likely that legacy news sources are still doing the news pretty much the way they always have but that the availability of alternative sources has allowed people to diverge their opinion from a mainstream one more than they could before? (Which I'm not saying is good or bad. I think it likely has benefits and drawbacks.)

replies(1): >>downer+rC1
2. downer+rC1[view] [source] 2020-04-03 16:48:41
>>Dubiou+(OP)
CNN is certainly doing things far differently than it did in the early days. It might not have been Reuters, but it was still quite neutral and of good journalistic quality. (These days it seems more reminiscent of Jerry Springer.)
[go to top]