zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. j4nt4b+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-02 20:16:50
What are the legal implications for Amazon from these revelations? I already know it's illegal to discourage union activity, but I'm curious about how this evidence affects the situation.
replies(2): >>vkou+8 >>binary+h8
2. vkou+8[view] [source] 2020-04-02 20:17:47
>>j4nt4b+(OP)
A civil suit from Smalls, maybe.

All of this evidence would have been found as part of discovery if there would have been real litigation, anyway, so I doubt it's going to be particularly painful for Amazon.

3. binary+h8[view] [source] 2020-04-02 20:57:53
>>j4nt4b+(OP)
If admissible, this may be evidence in a wider case for a labor law violation. The NY Atty General was notably unhappy about what had transpired: https://www.npr.org/2020/03/31/824423595/new-york-attorney-g...

...Until events unfold more, we cannot speculate as to the charges (if any) will be brought against Amazon.

replies(1): >>imglor+Wb
◧◩
4. imglor+Wb[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 21:16:50
>>binary+h8
NYAG also called for NLRB to weigh in, which isn't going to happen. They've been offlined at the worst time.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/nlrb-suspends-unionizing-am...

[go to top]