zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. JoeAlt+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-04-02 17:02:42
Its not about guarantees. Its about reducing the infection exponent. Which all of these recommendations absolutely help with.
replies(1): >>ck2+33
2. ck2+33[view] [source] 2020-04-02 17:20:04
>>JoeAlt+(OP)
I think my point is being misunderstood. 6 feet is not enough, at all.

Yeah it's "more than nothing" but is that what we should be aiming for? Or a little higher.

replies(3): >>JoeAlt+w3 >>viewer+g4 >>acomar+V4
◧◩
3. JoeAlt+w3[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 17:22:43
>>ck2+33
Ok, sure. Its just that its popular to post rags on the recommendations like they don't matter. Without any actionable suggestions. Which is not very helpful.
◧◩
4. viewer+g4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 17:27:04
>>ck2+33
What's the proper distance?
replies(1): >>ck2+hj
◧◩
5. acomar+V4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 17:31:02
>>ck2+33
there's an element of "what will people actually do". 6 feet gets the idea across while not coming across as "don't be in the same room as other people", which people will ignore.
◧◩◪
6. ck2+hj[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-02 18:54:14
>>viewer+g4
There may not be any safe distance in the same room/area with someone who is infected even asymptomatic without fever (yet)

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/02/health/aerosol-coronavirus-sp...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronaviru...

[go to top]