zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. lonela+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-03-31 22:44:22
And if we was told to stay home because to prevent unionizing, that's retaliation. Intent matters in law.
replies(1): >>rumana+lG
2. rumana+lG[view] [source] 2020-04-01 06:13:06
>>lonela+(OP)
> And if we was told to stay home because to prevent unionizing,

But the worker was placed on a 15 day paid leave to self quarantine because he stated he had direct contact with someone infected with covid19.

And then he not only broke his quarantine but also made it his point to go to work, potentially risking his colleagues.

Even if you argue that he did't carried covid19, that action is not justifiable, neither safety-wise nor legaly-wise.

replies(1): >>throwa+ZQ
◧◩
3. throwa+ZQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-04-01 08:45:33
>>rumana+lG
over and over in this thread you have been repeatedly told that amazon waited well over 2 weeks to "quarantine" him (and only him, nobody else that was exposed) despite knowing he was exposed (and also did not tell him).

Yet in every post you make, you continue to misrepresent the situation.

You are being hugely dishonest

[go to top]